I just wanted to give an update to this thread. After seeing the print quality of the Epson Expression HD XP-15000 and being satisfied with the results, the objective was to reproduce these results, but with a printer that would not consume so much ink, or where ink was more abundant. I am happy to say that I found this in the Epson ET-7700.
I have now gone through 5 printers; the Brother HL-L8360CDW, the Epson Expression HD XP-15000, the Canon PIXMA G4210, the HP Color LaserJet Pro M479FDW and now the Epson ET-7700. The Canon did pretty well, the HP was pretty much the same quality as the Brother, but the one that reigns supreme is the ET-7700, for sure. All of the Laser printers I have used, no matter what setting they were set to, they did not print high quality, pixel perfect labels.
Not only is the ET-7700 a workhorse, but it also prints fast (much faster than the HD XP-15000), it prints high quality labels that rival that of the HD XP-15000 and it not only has Ink tanks that hold a butt ton of Ink, instead of cartridges, but it also comes with two bottles of each Ink in the box. Also, it has a total of 5 ink colors instead of only 4.
Overall, I am extremely pleased. It took a lot of time and money, but this thing prints crip and near pixel perfect on the weatherproof gloss, the weatherproof matte and the polyester labels. To fill the tanks with a total capacity of apparently 30 ink cartridges, it only costs $72 for a set of ink bottle refills. I have not estimated the cost per page yet, but a rough calculation, even at a very high coverage percentage, is equal to pennies.
I hope this will be able to help someone else in their journey to find a decent printer with a low cost to print.
P.S. I used to buy my labels from a label printing company that print out very VERY nice labels. Not only does this printer print labels that are just as high quality looking on the material I have purchased from Online Labels, but the cost to print them has now been decreased by about $0.30 per label. VERY SATISFIED! :-)
Edited by user Thursday, August 15, 2019 2:10:06 PM(EST)
| Reason: typos